Salami v. Eagen et al

Filing 84

ORDER Accepting 71 Report and Recommendation Denying 61 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Michael Mohammed Salami and Denying 64 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Michael Mohammed Salami. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (BSau)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL MOHAMMED SALAMI, Plaintiff, vs. TRUMBLEY, et al., Case No. 19-CV-11558 HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [ECF No. 71] Plaintiff Michael Mohammed Salami, an inmate in the custody of the Michigan Department of Corrections (”MDOC”), filed this pro se civil rights action on May 28, 2019. Plaintiff filed two essentially identical motions for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 60 and ECF No. 61), which were referred to the Magistrate Judge for a Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge recommends that both motions be denied without prejudice as premature because discovery has not yet taken place. No timely objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation. This Court agrees with and adopts the analysis conducted and recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. Now, therefore, for the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge, the recommendations are adopted as orders of the court. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 71] is accepted by the Court. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions for partial summary judgment [ECF No. 61 and ECF No. 64] are DENIED without prejudice. Dated: October 16, 2020 s/George Caram Steeh GEORGE CARAM STEEH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on October 16, 2020, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also on Michael Mohammed Salami #879045, Carson City Correctional Facility, 10274 Boyer Road, Carson City, MI 48811. s/Brianna Sauve Deputy Clerk -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?