Rea v. Road Commission for Oakland County et al
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' 32 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin)
Case 2:19-cv-11567-DML-RSW ECF No. 45, PageID.366 Filed 01/05/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case Number 19-11567
Honorable David M. Lawson
ROAD COMMISSION FOR OAKLAND
COUNTY and GILBERT LUEBKE,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to all
counts in the plaintiff’s complaint.
In his response, the plaintiff withdrew certain claims
voluntarily. The Court has reviewed the submission of the parties and held oral argument on the
remaining claims on January 5, 2021. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court announced from
the bench its decision to grant in part and deny in part the defendants’ motion for summary
Accordingly, for the reasons stated on the record, it is ORDERED that the defendants’
motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 32) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
It is further ORDERED that Counts 1, 2, 3, and 5 of the complaint are DISMISSED
It is further ORDERED that the claims in Count 4 of the complaint alleging weight
discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation under federal and state law, and failure
to promote under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, only, are DISMISSED WITH
Case 2:19-cv-11567-DML-RSW ECF No. 45, PageID.367 Filed 01/05/21 Page 2 of 2
It is further ORDERED that the defendants’ motion is DENIED in all other respects.
s/David M. Lawson
DAVID M. LAWSON
United States District Judge
Dated: January 5, 2021
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?