Rea v. Road Commission for Oakland County et al

Filing 45

ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' 32 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (SPin)

Download PDF
Case 2:19-cv-11567-DML-RSW ECF No. 45, PageID.366 Filed 01/05/21 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PAUL REA, Plaintiff, Case Number 19-11567 Honorable David M. Lawson v. ROAD COMMISSION FOR OAKLAND COUNTY and GILBERT LUEBKE, Defendants. / ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to all counts in the plaintiff’s complaint. In his response, the plaintiff withdrew certain claims voluntarily. The Court has reviewed the submission of the parties and held oral argument on the remaining claims on January 5, 2021. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court announced from the bench its decision to grant in part and deny in part the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, for the reasons stated on the record, it is ORDERED that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 32) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. It is further ORDERED that Counts 1, 2, 3, and 5 of the complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED that the claims in Count 4 of the complaint alleging weight discrimination, hostile work environment, and retaliation under federal and state law, and failure to promote under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, only, are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Case 2:19-cv-11567-DML-RSW ECF No. 45, PageID.367 Filed 01/05/21 Page 2 of 2 It is further ORDERED that the defendants’ motion is DENIED in all other respects. s/David M. Lawson DAVID M. LAWSON United States District Judge Dated: January 5, 2021 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?