Chapman et al v. General Motors LLC

Filing 80

OPINION and ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 48 Motion to Dismiss; and Resolving 52 , 62 , 68 , 69 , 72 , 74 , 75 , 78 Other Motions. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (Attachments: # 1 Table of Claims) (AChu)

X*

3 III

Breach of K

X

4 C.I

CP

X

16 G.I

CP

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

IWM
UE
CP
UE
CP
IWM
CP
IWM
CP
UE
IWM

G.II
G.III
H.I
H.II
I.I
I.II
J.I
J.II
K.I
K.II
K.III

28 L.I

CP

29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38

CP
UE
CP
IWM
CP
UE
CP
IWM
UE
CP

L.II
L.III
M.I
M.II
N.I
N.II
O.I
O.II
O.III
P.I

AL
X
AZ
AR
CA

CO

CT
DC
DE
FL

GA
HI
ID
IL

P
ot
es
N

Cannot maintain a class claim
seeking damages under state statute

Fradulent
Concealment

AK

w
/o

X

2 II

IWM
UE
CP
IWM
CP
CP
IWM
CP
CP
IWM
IWM

re
ju
di
ce

e
ju
di
c

Placeholder claim

X*

C.II
C.III
D.I
D.II
E.I
Ark.I
Ark.II
F.I
F.II
F.III
F.IV

D

X

MMWA

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

is
m
is
s

w
/P
re
is
m
is
s

Su
rv
iv
es

St
at
e

T
yp
e

ou
nt
C

la
im
C

D

X

*Only survives as to any sub-class
with valid IWM claims.
*Dismissed as to OH, NJ, SC (failure
to allege duty to disclose), CA, MI,
NH (barred by economic loss
doctrine), LA, MS, TN, OR
(preempted by state statute) subclasses.
Plaintiffs concede this claim
Plaintiff does not meet use
requirements of state statute
Lack of privity

1I

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X

Lack of privity
Class claim preempted by state
statute

Lack of privity, time-barred

39
40
41
42
43
44

P.II
P.III
Q.I
R.I
R.II
S.I

IWM
UE
CP
CP
IWM
CP

45 T.I

CP

46
47
48
49
50
51
52

IWM
CP
IWM
CP
IWM
CP
IWM

T.II
U.I
U.II
V.I
V.II
W.I
W.I

53 X.I

CP

54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78

IWM
UE
CP
IWM
IWM
CP
IWM
UE
CP
IWM
CP
IWM
CP
IWM
CP
IWM
UE
CP
IWM
CP
IWM
CP
CP
IWM
UE

X.II
X.III
Y.I
Y.II
Z.I
AA.I
AA.II
AA.III
BB.I
BB.II
CC.I
CC.II
DD.I
DD.II
EE.I
EE.II
EE.III
FF.I
FF.II
GG.I
GG.II
HH.I
HH.II
HH.III
HH.IV

79 II.I

CP

80 II.II

IWM

81 JJ.I

CP

82 JJ.II
83 KK.I
84 KK.II

IWM
CP
IWM

85 LL.I

CP

86 LL.II
87 MM.I
88 MM.II

WIM
CP
IWM

IN
IA
KS
KY
LA
ME
MD
MA

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

MS
MO
MT
NE
NV
NH
NJ
NM
NY

ND
OH
OK
OR

X

Lack of privity

X

Claims solely for economic losses are
barred by state statute

X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

NC

X

Automobile sales are exempted from
the MCPA
Lack of notice, time-barred

Claims for injunctive relief barred by
state statute

X

MI
MN

Class claim preempted by state
statute, precluded by LPLA

X

X
X

X

X
X
X
X
X

Improperly pled under OCSPA
Claims for injunctive relief barred by
state statute

89 NN.I

CP

90
91
92
93
94

IWM
UE
CP
IWM
UE

NN.II
NN.III
OO.I
OO.II
OO.III

95 PP.I

RI

CP
IWM
CP
IWM

PP.II
PP.III
QQ.I
QQ.II

100 RR.I

IWM
CP
IWM
CP
IWM
CP
IWM
CP
IWM
CP
IWM
CP
CP
IWM

SC
SD

CP

101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114

RR.II
SS.I
SS.II
TT.I
TT.II
UU.I
UU.II
VV.I
VV.II
WW.I
WW.II
XX.I
YY.I
YY.II

X

PA

CP

96
97
98
99

X

VT
VA
WA
WV
WI
WY
TOTAL:

114

Class claim preempted by state
statute

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

Class claim preempted by state
statute
Lack of privity

X

Time-barred

X

TN
UT

Claims solely for economic losses are
barred by state statute, Plaintiff does
not meet use requirements of state
statute

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
93

20

1