Samul v. Social Security

Filing 16

ORDER denying 12 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 13 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 15 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Arthur J. Tarnow. (MLan)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
THEODORE SAMUL,
Case No. 20-10597
Plaintiff,
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
ARTHUR J. TARNOW

v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DAVID R. GRAND

Defendant.
/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [15], DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [12], AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [13]
On March 1, 2021, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and
Recommendation (“R&R”) [15] on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [12]
and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [13]. The R&R recommended that
the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion [12], grant Defendant’s Motion [13], and affirm
the decision of the Administrative Law Judge. Neither party filed an objection to the
R&R.
The Court having reviewed the record, the R&R [15] is hereby ADOPTED
and entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
Page 1 of 2

Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [12] is
DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment [13] is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 4, 2021

s/Arthur J. Tarnow
Arthur J. Tarnow
Senior United States District Judge

Page 2 of 2