Carbary v. SAUL
ORDER Adopting 20 Report and Recommendation Denying Plaintiff's 17 Motion for Summary Judgment and Granting Defendant's 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (BSau)
Case 2:20-cv-11292-GCS-EAS ECF No. 21, PageID.1106 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case No. 20-CV-11292
HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
ORDER ACCEPTING R&R (ECF No. 20), DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 17) AND GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 18)
Plaintiff Melanie Carbary brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
405(g), challenging the final decision of defendant Commissioner of Social
Security denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and
supplemental security income (“SSI”). Both parties filed summary
judgment motions that were referred to the Magistrate Judge for Report
and Recommendation (“R&R”). The Magistrate Judge issued her R&R on
August 19, 2021, recommending that plaintiff’s motion be denied,
defendant’s motion be granted, and the ALJ’s decision be affirmed.
No timely objections were filed to the R&R. The court has reviewed
the file, record, and Magistrate Judge's R&R. This court agrees with the
Case 2:20-cv-11292-GCS-EAS ECF No. 21, PageID.1107 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 2
analysis conducted by the Magistrate Judge, and therefore accepts her
recommendation. Now, therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for summary
judgment (ECF No. 17) is DENIED.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s motion for
summary judgment (ECF No. 18) is GRANTED.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that judgment enter for
Dated: September 7, 2021
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
September 7, 2021, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?