Johnson v. Elum et al
Filing
2
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court of apply the filing fee submitted in this case to case 20-12422 and closing this case as duplicative. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (DPer)
Case 2:20-cv-12733-GAD-CI ECF No. 2 filed 10/27/20
PageID.45
Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DWAYNE ANTHONY JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 20-cv-12733
v.
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
GERSHWIN A. DRAIN
HATATU ELUM, ET AL.,
Defendants.
______________ /
ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO APPLY THE FILING
FEE SUBMITTED IN THIS CASE TO CASE NUMBER 20-CV-12422 AND
CLOSING THIS CASE AS DUPLICATIVE
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Dwayne Anthony Johnson’s
prepaid civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See ECF No. 1. Plaintiff Johnson
is a state prisoner at the G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility in Jackson, Michigan.
Because his pro se Complaint in this matter is duplicative of a complaint that
Johnson filed about one month earlier, the Court will dismiss this case and direct the
Clerk of Court to apply the filing fee to the earlier case where no fee was paid.
I. BACKGROUND
On August 18, 2020, Plaintiff Johnson filed a pro se civil rights complaint that
was assigned to Judge Matthew F. Leitman, another judge in this District. The
Complaint names Hatatu Elum, Michelle Parsons, Jeremy Howard, and T. Kisor as
Case 2:20-cv-12733-GAD-CI ECF No. 2 filed 10/27/20
PageID.46
Page 2 of 3
Defendants. Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants retaliated against Plaintiff by
transferring him to a different prison because he assisted another prisoner with some
legal work and filed a grievance against Defendant Elum. See Johnson v. Elum, et
al., No. 4:20-cv-12422, ECF No. 1, PageID.7 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 18, 2020).
Johnson did not pay the filing fee in Judge Leitman’s case (4:20-cv-12422).
Nor did Plaintiff apply for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in that case. However,
on September 15, 2020, Johnson commenced this case by filing an identical
complaint and prepaying the filing fee for the case in this Court.
II. DISCUSSION AND ORDER
The Court believes that Johnson intended to pay the filing fee in case number
4:20-cv-12422 when he submitted the duplicate complaint and the filing fee to the
Clerk of Court. It does not appear that he intended to file a new case with the same
allegations, issues, and defendants.
Furthermore, “[a]s part of its general power to administer its docket, a district
court may stay or dismiss a suit that is duplicative of another federal court suit.”
Curtis v. Citibank, N.A., 226 F.3d 133, 138 (2d Cir. 2000). “[S]imple dismissal of
the second suit is [a] common disposition because plaintiffs have no right to maintain
two actions on the same subject in the same court, against the same defendant at the
same time.” Id. at 138–139; accord Missouri ex rel. Nixon v. Prudential Health
Care Plan, Inc., 259 F.3d 949, 954 (8th Cir. 2001) (stating that “[p]laintiffs may not
2
Case 2:20-cv-12733-GAD-CI ECF No. 2 filed 10/27/20
PageID.47
Page 3 of 3
pursue multiple federal suits against the same party involving the same controversy
at the same time”); Zerilli v. Evening News Ass’n, 628 F.2d 217, 222 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
(stating that “a plaintiff has no right to maintain two separate actions involving the
same subject matter at the same time in the same court and against the same
defendant.”) (en banc) (internal citations omitted).
Plaintiff’s Complaint in this case is identical to the complaint that he filed in
case number 4:20-cv-12422. He has no right to maintain a duplicative action on the
same subject against the same defendants at the same time. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall apply the filing fee paid in
this case to case number 4:20-cv-12422.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is summarily DISMISSED as
duplicative of case number 4:20-cv-12422.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Gershwin A. Drain__________________
GERSHWIN A. DRAIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: October 27, 2020
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
October 27, 2020, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
/s/ Teresa McGovern
Case Manager
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?