Crowley v. Smith et al
Filing
4
OPINION AND ORDER Dismissing Case. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (BSau)
Case 2:20-cv-12739-GCS-KGA ECF No. 4, PageID.14 Filed 01/07/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
GREGORY CROWLEY, #687998,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 2:20-CV-12739
HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH
v.
LT. SMITH, et al.,
Defendants.
_____________________________/
OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE
Michigan prisoner Gregory Crowley (“plaintiff”) filed a pro se civil
rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, but did not submit either the
$350.00 filing fee and $50.00 administrative fee or an application to
proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. The Court issued a
deficiency order on October 21, 2020 requiring the plaintiff to submit the
required fees or to submit an application to proceed without prepayment of
the filing fee within 30 days of the filing date of the order. The order
provided that if he did not do so, his case would be dismissed. The plaintiff
has not corrected the deficiency within the allotted time. Accordingly, the
Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE this case for failure to comply
-1-
Case 2:20-cv-12739-GCS-KGA ECF No. 4, PageID.15 Filed 01/07/21 Page 2 of 2
with the federal rules and the Court’s prior order. Should the plaintiff wish
to pursue his civil rights claims, he must file a new civil rights action that
complies with the applicable filing requirements. This case is closed and
will not be reopened.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/George Caram Steeh
GEORGE CARAM STEEH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: January 7, 2021
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on
January 7, 2021, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also on
Gregory Crowley #687998, Saginaw Correctional Facility,
9625 Pierce Road, Freeland, MI 48623,
s/Brianna Sauve
Deputy Clerk
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?