Loyd v. Driggett et al

Filing 33

ORDER Adopting 32 Report and Recommendation for Granting in Part and Denying in Part 17 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Herman Marable, Jr. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)

Download PDF
Case 2:20-cv-13099-SFC-KGA ECF No. 33, PageID.190 Filed 12/13/21 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Ca’Ron Elestrious-Gend Loyd, Plaintiff, Civil Case No. 20-13099 v. Herman Marable, et al., Sean F. Cox United States District Court Judge Defendants. ______________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING 11/12/21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEFENDANT MARABLE’S MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff, an incarcerated person, filed this pro se action asserting claims against a litany of Defendants, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Upon screening of the complaint, Plaintiff’s claims were dismissed against all but two defendants, Burton Police Officer Jeremy Driggett and state district judge Herman Marable, Jr.. (See ECF No. 6). The matter was then referred to the magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings. (ECF No. 10). On November 12, 2021, Magistrate Judge Kimberly Altman issued a Report and Recommendation wherein she recommends that a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Marable be granted in part and denied in part: Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that Marable’s motion to dismiss be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Specifically, the undersigned recommends that Loyd’s § 1983 claim against Marable be dismissed with prejudice and that the Court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claims against Marable, dismissing them without prejudice. (ECF No. 32 at 14) 1 Case 2:20-cv-13099-SFC-KGA ECF No. 33, PageID.191 Filed 12/13/21 Page 2 of 2 The time permitted for the parties to file objections to that Report and Recommendation has passed and no objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the November 12, 2021 Report and Recommendation. The Court ORDERS that Defendant Marable’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED to the extent that the Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s § 1983 claim against Marable and the Court DECLINES TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION over any state-law claims against Marable and dismiss those claims without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Sean F. Cox Sean F. Cox United States District Judge Dated: December 13, 2021 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?