Loyd v. Driggett et al
Filing
46
ORDER Adopting 44 Report and Recommendation for Granting 35 Motion filed by Jeremy Driggett. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
Case 2:20-cv-13099-SFC-KGA ECF No. 46, PageID.384 Filed 05/19/22 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
Ca’Ron Elestrious-Gend Loyd,
Plaintiff,
Civil Case No. 20-13099
v.
Herman Marable, et al.,
Sean F. Cox
United States District Court Judge
Defendants.
______________________________/
ORDER
ADOPTING 4/18/22 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
AND GRANTING DEFENDANT DRIGGETT’S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
Plaintiff, an incarcerated person, filed this pro se action asserting claims against a litany
of Defendants, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Upon screening of the complaint, Plaintiff’s claims
were dismissed against all but two defendants, Burton Police Officer Jeremy Driggett and state
district judge Herman Marable, Jr.. (See ECF No. 6). The matter was then referred to the
magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings. (ECF No. 10).
At this juncture, Driggett is the only remaining Defendant. On April 18, 2022, the
magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 44) (“the R&R”) wherein she
recommends that the Court grant Defendant Driggett’s summary judgment motion and dismiss
Plaintiff’s claims against Driggett with prejudice.
The time permitted for the parties to file objections to that Report and Recommendation
has passed and no objections were filed. Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the April 18,
2022 Report and Recommendation. The Court ORDERS that Defendant Driggett’s summary
judgment motion is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims against Driggett are DISMISSED WITH
1
Case 2:20-cv-13099-SFC-KGA ECF No. 46, PageID.385 Filed 05/19/22 Page 2 of 2
PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Sean F. Cox
Sean F. Cox
United States District Judge
Dated: May 19, 2022
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?