Mock v. United States of America

Filing 30

ORDER granting 23 Motion to Stay Discovery and Adjourn Scheduling Order and granting 29 Motion for Order Regarding. Signed by District Judge Robert J. White. (KCas)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TERRY LEE MOCK, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. UNITED STATES OF AMERCA, Case No. 23-10525 Honorable Robert J. White Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. TERRY LEE MOCK and ROBERT WITTENBERG, as the treasurer of Oakland county, Michigan, Counterclaim Defendants. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY AND ADJOURN SCHEDULING ORDER DATES AND GRANTING JOINT MOTION REGARDING AMENDED BRIEFING Before the Court are motions (1) from the United States to stay discovery and adjourn the scheduling order dates, and (2) from the United States and Terry Lee Mock regarding amended briefing for the United States’ motion for partial summary judgment. The Court agrees that a stay is appropriate while the partial summary judgment motion is pending, and that the contemplated amended briefing arrangement will best assist the Court to resolve that motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States’ unopposed motion to stay (ECF No. 23) is GRANTED, general discovery is STAYED, and the scheduling order dates are ADJOURNED until further notice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the joint motion regarding amended briefing (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED. The Court will only review the United States’ partial summary judgment motion (ECF No. 22), Mock’s amended response to that motion (ECF No. 28), and the United States’ forthcoming amended reply in support of that motion, which must be filed by September 6, 2024 and may be up to 11 pages in length. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 30, 2024 s/Robert J. White Robert J. White United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?