Morgan et al v. Environmental Wood Solutions II, LLC
Filing
16
ORDER Terminating Without Prejudice (1) Defendant's 5 Motion for Sanctions and (2) Defendant's 6 Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DARYL MORGAN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Civil No. 23-cv-11500
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
v.
ENVIRONMENTAL WOOD
SOLUTIONS, II, LLC,
Defendant.
__________________________________________________________________/
ORDER TERMINATING WITHOUT PREJUDICE (1) DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (ECF No. 5) AND (2) DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS AND COMPEL ARBITRATION (ECF No. 6)
On June 30, 2023, Defendant Environmental Wood Solutions, II, LLC filed
two motions in this action: (1) a motion for sanctions (ECF No. 5) and (2) a motion
to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint and to compel Plaintiffs to arbitrate their claims
(ECF No. 6).
On November 13, 2023, the Court held an on-the-record status conference in
this case. During that conference, counsel for the parties informed the Court that
they were working to finalize an agreement to arbitrate Plaintiffs’ claims and that
that agreement would resolve Environmental Wood Solutions’ pending motions.
Accordingly, for the reasons discussed with counsel during the November 13, 2023,
status conference, Environmental Wood Solutions’ motions for sanctions and to
1
dismiss and compel arbitration (ECF Nos. 5, 6) are TERMINATED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: November 13, 2023
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the
parties and/or counsel of record on November 13, 2023, by electronic means and/or
ordinary mail.
s/Holly A. Ryan
Case Manager
(313) 234-5126
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?