Morgan et al v. Environmental Wood Solutions II, LLC

Filing 16

ORDER Terminating Without Prejudice (1) Defendant's 5 Motion for Sanctions and (2) Defendant's 6 Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DARYL MORGAN, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil No. 23-cv-11500 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. ENVIRONMENTAL WOOD SOLUTIONS, II, LLC, Defendant. __________________________________________________________________/ ORDER TERMINATING WITHOUT PREJUDICE (1) DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (ECF No. 5) AND (2) DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND COMPEL ARBITRATION (ECF No. 6) On June 30, 2023, Defendant Environmental Wood Solutions, II, LLC filed two motions in this action: (1) a motion for sanctions (ECF No. 5) and (2) a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint and to compel Plaintiffs to arbitrate their claims (ECF No. 6). On November 13, 2023, the Court held an on-the-record status conference in this case. During that conference, counsel for the parties informed the Court that they were working to finalize an agreement to arbitrate Plaintiffs’ claims and that that agreement would resolve Environmental Wood Solutions’ pending motions. Accordingly, for the reasons discussed with counsel during the November 13, 2023, status conference, Environmental Wood Solutions’ motions for sanctions and to 1 dismiss and compel arbitration (ECF Nos. 5, 6) are TERMINATED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: November 13, 2023    I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on November 13, 2023, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/Holly A. Ryan Case Manager (313) 234-5126 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?