Stringer v. Bhamini et al

Filing 38

ORDER granting 37 Motion to Stay Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris. (KCas)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ANDRE D. STRINGER, Case No. 2:23-cv-11829 Paul D. Borman United States District Judge Plaintiff, v. Patricia T. Morris United States Magistrate Judge SUDHIR BHAMINI, et al., Defendants. / ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SUDHIR BHAMINI’S MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY (ECF No. 37) Many of the affirmative defenses raised by the defendants involve threshold legal issues which the United States Supreme Court has directed be resolved prior to discovery taking place. Harlow v Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 818 (1982); Criss v City of Kent, 867 F.2d 259, 261 (6th Cir. 1988); Lovado v Keohane, 992 F.2d 601 (6th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that defendant Bhamini’s motion is GRANTED. Discovery in this cause of action is STAYED pending resolution of the dispositive motion filed by the defendants. Should this case survive the dispositive motion, a scheduling order shall be issued. Date: March 26, 2024 S/patricia t. morris Patricia T. Morris United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?