Saavedra v. Amazon.Com Services, Inc

Filing 21

ORDER Terminating Defendant's 7 Initial Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice as Moot. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MERCADIES SAAVEDRA, Plaintiff, Case No. 23-cv-12716 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC., Defendant. __________________________________________________________________/ ORDER TERMINATING DEFENDANT’S INITIAL MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 7) WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT On October 25, 2023, Plaintiff Mercadies Saavedra filed this employment discrimination action against Defendant Services, Inc. (See Compl., ECF No. 1.) thereafter filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (See Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 7.) On February 2, 2024, without expressing any view regarding the merits of the Motion to Dismiss, the Court issued an order granting Saavedra leave to file a First Amended Complaint in order to remedy the alleged deficiencies in her claims identified by (See Order, ECF No. 14.) The Court informed the parties that if Saavedra provided notice that she intended to file a First Amended Complaint, the Court would terminate’s Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. (See id.) 1 On February 26, 2024, Saavedra filed a First Amended Complaint in this case. (See First Am. Compl., ECF No. 16.) And has now filed a renewed Motion to Dismiss that pleading. (See Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 18.) Accordingly, the Court TERMINATES’s initial motion to dismiss (ECF No. 7) WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: March 27, 2024 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on March 27, 2024, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/Holly A. Ryan Case Manager (313) 234-5126 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?