Saavedra v. Amazon.Com Services, Inc
Filing
21
ORDER Terminating Defendant's 7 Initial Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice as Moot. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MERCADIES SAAVEDRA,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 23-cv-12716
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
v.
AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC.,
Defendant.
__________________________________________________________________/
ORDER TERMINATING DEFENDANT’S INITIAL MOTION
TO DISMISS (ECF No. 7) WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT
On October 25, 2023, Plaintiff Mercadies Saavedra filed this employment
discrimination action against Defendant Amazon.com Services, Inc. (See Compl.,
ECF No. 1.) Amazon.com thereafter filed a Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (See Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 7.)
On February 2, 2024, without expressing any view regarding the merits of the
Motion to Dismiss, the Court issued an order granting Saavedra leave to file a First
Amended Complaint in order to remedy the alleged deficiencies in her claims
identified by Amazon.com. (See Order, ECF No. 14.) The Court informed the
parties that if Saavedra provided notice that she intended to file a First Amended
Complaint, the Court would terminate Amazon.com’s Motion to Dismiss without
prejudice. (See id.)
1
On February 26, 2024, Saavedra filed a First Amended Complaint in this case.
(See First Am. Compl., ECF No. 16.) And Amazon.com has now filed a renewed
Motion to Dismiss that pleading. (See Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 18.) Accordingly,
the Court TERMINATES Amazon.com’s initial motion to dismiss (ECF No. 7)
WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: March 27, 2024
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the
parties and/or counsel of record on March 27, 2024, by electronic means and/or
ordinary mail.
s/Holly A. Ryan
Case Manager
(313) 234-5126
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?