West Village Michigan, LLC v. Tayler et al
Filing
18
ORDER STAYING CASE FOR THIRTY DAYS Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford. (DAll)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
WEST VILLAGE MICHIGAN,
LLC.,
Case No. 24-cv-13307
Honorable David M. Lawson
Plaintiff, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford
v.
CANDICE TAYLER, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER STAYING CASE FOR THIRTY DAYS
During a status conference held on March 4, 2025, the Court
explained to Defendant Candice Tayler that she may proceed pro se but
that she must find an attorney to represent Defendant Powerful Sky Real
Estate Management. See Bischoff v. Waldorf, 660 F. Supp. 2d 815, 820
(E.D. Mich. 2009) (“A corporation must appear by counsel or not at all.”).
By April 30, 2025, Tayler must retain an attorney for Powerful Sky or
contact the University of Detroit Mercy pro se legal clinic at (313) 234-2690.
All proceedings are STAYED through that date.
s/Elizabeth A. Stafford
ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD
United States Magistrate Judge
Dated: March 5, 2025
NOTICE TO PARTIES ABOUT OBJECTIONS
Within 14 days of being served with this order, any party may file
objections with the assigned district judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). The
district judge may sustain an objection only if the order is clearly erroneous
or contrary to law. 28 U.S.C. § 636. “When an objection is filed to a
magistrate judge’s ruling on a non-dispositive motion, the ruling
remains in full force and effect unless and until it is stayed by the
magistrate judge or a district judge.” E.D. Mich. LR 72.2.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that this document was served on counsel
of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to
their email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of
Electronic Filing on March 5, 2025.
s/Davon Allen
DAVON ALLEN
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?