Graf Miller v. Joaquin et al
Filing
81
ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to File a Signed Objection to the Garnishment re: 78 Objection to Garnishment filed by Richard Graf Miller., ( Objection due by 4/6/2020) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
______________________________________________________________________
RICHARD GRAF MILLER,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 18-11429
MICHAEL ERIC JOAQUIN, and
FATHER AND SONS
COLLECTIBLES, INC.,
Defendants.
__________________________________/
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A SIGNED OBJECTION TO
GARNISHMENT
On February 11, 2020, the court issued an order granting Defendants’ request for
attorney fees. (ECF No. 72.) Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s counsel were held jointly and
severally liable for $1,320, largely due to Plaintiff’s signature being inexcusably missing
on his answers to interrogatories. (Id., PageID.1108.) Although the decision was
appealed by Defendants, on February 21, the court was given notice that Defendants
had received payment. (ECF No. 73.)
Defendants filed a request for a writ of garnishment, which was issued on March
2. (ECF No. 77.) Defendants sought $3,256.95 in “postjudgment costs.” (Id.,
PageID.1123.) Subtracting the $1,320 already received, the total amount owed was
listed at $1,936.95. (Id.) Plaintiff filed an objection to garnishment on March 23
contesting this amount. (ECF No. 78.)
Plaintiff’s objection to garnishment does not include a signature. (Id.,
PageID.1124.) Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(a), “[e]very pleading, written
motion, and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the
attorney's name—or by a party personally if the party is unrepresented.” If a filing is not
signed, the court must strike it “unless the omission is promptly corrected after being
called to the attorney's or party's attention.” Id.; see, e.g., Fuller v. Heyns, Case No. 1212371, 2012 WL 2374222, at *2 (E.D. Mich. June 22, 2012) (Roberts, J.) (discussing
prisoner complaints filed without signatures). The court also notes the form Plaintiff
used to file his objection, issued by the State of Michigan, includes instructions that the
filer “[w]rite in the date . . . and sign.” State Court Admin. Office, State of Mich.,
Instructions for Filing and Serving “Objections to Garnishment” (2018).
The court now calls to Plaintiff’s attention the lack of a signature on his objection
to garnishment. Plaintiff must refile his objection with a signature, either his own or
counsel’s, within ten days of this order. If Plaintiff fails to do so, the court must strike
Plaintiff’s objection. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file a signed copy of his “Objection
. . . to Writ of Garnishment Issued” (ECF No. 78) by April 6, 2020 .
s/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
/
Dated: March 25, 2020
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, March 25, 2020, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
(810) 292-6522
S:\Cleland\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\18-11429.MILLER.GarnishmentSignature.RMK.docx
2
/
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?