Barajas v. SAUL
ORDER Adopting 15 Report and Recommendation; Granting 14 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Commissioner of Social Security and Denying 12 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Carolyn Barajas, Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
Case 3:20-cv-11219-RHC-APP ECF No. 16, PageID.554 Filed 09/08/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
CASE NO: 20-CV-11219
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. The
case was referred to United States Magistrate Anthony P. Patti pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. The magistrate judge issued his report on August
10, 2021 recommending that this court deny plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment,
and grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment. No objections have been filed
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived. 1
Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the recommended findings and conclusions of
the Magistrate Judge.
The failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the court from its duty to
independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
Case 3:20-cv-11219-RHC-APP ECF No. 16, PageID.555 Filed 09/08/21 Page 2 of 2
IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report
and Recommendation, the Plaintiff’s  Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED
and Defendant’s  Motion for Summary judgment is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: September 8, 2021
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
and/or pro se parties on this date, September 8, 2021, by electronic and/or ordinary
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?