Carhartt, Inc. v. COSTA DEL MAR, INC.
Filing
30
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
Case 3:21-cv-11844-RHC-CI ECF No. 30, PageID.282 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
CARHARTT, INC.
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 3:21-cv-11844-RHC-CI
COSTA DEL MAR, INC.
Defendant.
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), the Plaintiff Carhartt, Inc.
and Defendant Costa Del Mar, Inc. hereby stipulate to entry of the following
Protective Order:
I.
Scope
This Protective Order shall govern the production and exchange of all
documents, deposition testimony, interrogatory answers, responses to requests for
admissions, and other information produced, disclosed, given, or exchanged by
and among the parties and/or third parties to another party or parties in the course
of this action. Persons who are not parties to this Action, but who are required to
produce documents in response to a subpoena in connection with this action, shall
Case 3:21-cv-11844-RHC-CI ECF No. 30, PageID.283 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 10
be entitled to invoke the provisions of this Order as if such non-party were a party
to this action.
II.
Protected Material
1.
Confidential Information – Any document or thing that a party
reasonably and in good faith believes to contain confidential information that is not
publicly available (such as research and development, commercial, or other sensitive
information) may be produced by that party with the clear and obvious designation
“CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.”
2.
Non-Disclosure of Confidential Information – Any document or
thing designated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER”
may only be used to prosecute or defend this action and shall not be disclosed to (or
the content discussed with) anyone other than the following persons:
a.
The named parties in this case, their attorneys, and their support
staff (e.g., copying and document management personnel).
b.
Independent experts or consultants engaged by a party’s
attorneys to assist in the preparation and trial of this case who
agree to abide by the terms of this Protective Order by signing
Exhibit A and who are approved by the producing party pursuant
to paragraph 5 below.
c.
Deposition witnesses whose testimony is being taken with
respect to the document or thing, or about the subject matter of
2
Case 3:21-cv-11844-RHC-CI ECF No. 30, PageID.284 Filed 01/17/23 Page 3 of 10
the document or thing, who agree to abide by the terms of this
Protective Order.
d.
3.
This Court and its staff members.
Highly Confidential Information – Attorney’s Eyes Only – Any
document or thing that a party in good faith believes to contain highly confidential
information that is not publicly available (such as a trade secret, or highly
confidential research and development, commercial, or other sensitive information)
may be produced by that party with the clear and obvious designation “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.”
4.
Non-Disclosure of Highly Confidential Information – Any
document or thing designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S
EYES ONLY” may only be used to prosecute or defend this action and shall not be
disclosed to (nor the content discussed with) anyone other than the following
persons:
a.
Outside attorneys of record in this lawsuit and their support staff
(e.g., copying and document management personnel).
b.
Independent experts or consultants engaged by a party’s
attorneys to assist in the preparation and trial of this case who
agree to abide by the terms of this Protective Order by signing
Exhibit A and who are approved by the producing party pursuant
to paragraph 5 below.
3
Case 3:21-cv-11844-RHC-CI ECF No. 30, PageID.285 Filed 01/17/23 Page 4 of 10
c.
Deposition witnesses whose testimony is being taken with
respect to the document or thing, or about the subject matter of
the document or thing, who agree to abide by the terms of this
Protective Order.
d.
III.
This Court and its staff members.
Other Considerations
5.
Disclosure to Experts and Consultants – Before any documents,
testimony, or other information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO
PROTECTIVE ORDER” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES
ONLY” are disclosed to an independent expert or consultant, the receiving party
shall give the producing party ten (10) days written notice of the proposed expert. If
the producing party objects to the expert, no designated material or information of
the producing party shall be disclosed to the expert or consultant until the issue is
resolved by the Court.
6.
Deposition Testimony – Any portions of requested testimony, a
transcript and/or a brief may be designated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO
PROTECTIVE ORDER” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES
ONLY” if the party or attorney making the designation reasonably and in good faith
believes it will reveal a trade secret or other confidential research and development,
commercial, or sensitive information.
4
Case 3:21-cv-11844-RHC-CI ECF No. 30, PageID.286 Filed 01/17/23 Page 5 of 10
7.
Motion Practice – All documents, testimony, and information
designated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” or
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” that are submitted
to the Court Clerk as part of a motion or other paper shall be filed pursuant to Local
Rule 5.3. A redacted copy of the motion or paper may be filed with the Court Clerk
through the Court’s electronic filing system and an unredacted copy of the motion
or paper may be filed under seal.
An unsealed or unredacted copy of the confidential document, testimony, or
information may be used for the judge’s courtesy copy of the motion, but each page
containing confidential information shall be marked in such a way that it clearly
notifies the Court that the page contains confidential information that was filed
pursuant to Local Rule 5.3. The judge’s courtesy copy of the motion shall be sent
directly to the Judge’s chambers and not filed with the Court Clerk.
8.
Discovery from Third Parties – This Protective Order shall apply to
discovery sought from persons or companies who are not parties to this lawsuit.
Third
parties
may
designate
information
produced
under
either
the
“CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” designation.
9.
Challenging “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” Designation
– Any party that wishes to challenge the designation of any document, thing, or
testimony as confidential or highly confidential under Federal Rule of Civil
5
Case 3:21-cv-11844-RHC-CI ECF No. 30, PageID.287 Filed 01/17/23 Page 6 of 10
Procedure 26(c) may do so at any time by way of motion to this Court. The
designating party shall have the burden of justifying its designation. Before filing
any such motion, however, the parties shall first attempt to resolve their
disagreement without Court intervention.
10.
Trial and Other Hearings –This Order shall not prevent any Protected
Material from being used by the Court or counsel at any hearing in this action or from
being offered and received into evidence at trial, provided that such use is made only
in accordance with such appropriate procedures as may be approved by the Court.
The parties shall confer to reach agreement regarding the procedures to be
recommended to the Court prior to the Trial and/or Hearing during which the
Protected Material may be used.
11.
Termination of Lawsuit – All documents and things designated as
“CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY,” and all copies thereof, shall
either be returned to the party that produced them upon the final disposition of this
action or they may be destroyed with permission of the party that produced them.
This provision shall not apply to documents and things the Court determines are not
confidential. Outside litigation counsel for each party may keep a copy of all
pleadings and other documents filed with the Court for their files.
12.
Non-Waver of Confidentiality – The production of any document or
information without a designation of “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO
6
Case 3:21-cv-11844-RHC-CI ECF No. 30, PageID.288 Filed 01/17/23 Page 7 of 10
PROTECTIVE ORDER” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES
ONLY,” whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of the producing party’s
claim of confidentiality in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding and
does not stop the producing party from designating the information or document as
confidential at a later date. Disclosure of the information or document by any
receiving party prior to receiving notice of such later designation will not be deemed
a violation of the provisions of this Order. Nothing in this provision shall waive any
party’s right to challenge any such designation pursuant to the terms of this Order.
13.
Non-Waiver of Privileged Material – Any production—whether
inadvertent or otherwise—of privilege or work product protected material shall not
result in the waiver of the producing party’s claim of any associated privilege
(attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, etc.) or stop the producing party
from designating the information or document as privileged pursuant to the terms of
this Order at a later date. This Order shall be interpreted to provide all protections
for privileged material allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 502 and has no effect
on a party’s right to challenge any such claim of privilege.
14. Use by Persons Producing Protected Material - Nothing in this
Order is intended to limit the rights of any party from which Protected Material
has originated to use its own Protected Material in any way such party sees fit.
15. Modifications - The terms of this Order are subject to modification,
extension, or limitation as agreed to by all parties to this action in writing, provided
7
Case 3:21-cv-11844-RHC-CI ECF No. 30, PageID.289 Filed 01/17/23 Page 8 of 10
that all parties join in, and the Court approves, such modification, extension, or
limitation.
SO ORDERED
Dated: January 17, 2023
s/Robert H. Cleland
Honorable Cleland
United States District Court Judge
Stipulated to and agreed:
By: /s/ Yafeez S. Fatabhoy w/ Consent
John S. Artz (P48578)
J. Benjamin Dolan (P47839)
Salina M. Hamilton (P_____)
Yafeez S. Fatabhoy (P83064)
DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC
350 S. Main Street, Suite 300
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
Tel: (734) 623-7075
Email: JSArtz@dickinsonwright.com
BDolan@dickinsonwright.com
SHamilton@dickinsonwright.com
YFatabhoy@dickinsonwright.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Carhartt, Inc.
Dated: January 17, 2023
By: /s/ Chelsea E. Pasquali
Marc Lorelli (P63156)
Chanille Carswell (P53754)
Rebecca J. Cantor (P76826)
Chelsea E. Pasquali (P77375)
BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.
1000 Town Center, 22nd Floor
Southfield, Michigan 48075
Tel: (248) 358-4400
Email: mlorelli@brookskushman.com
ccarswell@brookskushman.com
rcantor@brookskushman.com
cpasquali@brookskushman.com
resfahani@brookskushman.com
Attorneys for Defendant
Costa Del Mar, Inc.
Dated: January 17, 2023
8
Case 3:21-cv-11844-RHC-CI ECF No. 30, PageID.290 Filed 01/17/23 Page 9 of 10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
CARHARTT, INC.
Case No. 3:21-cv-11844-RHC-CI
Plaintiff,
v.
COSTA DEL MAR, INC.
Defendant.
EXHIBIT A – AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND BY PROTECTIVE ORDER
I, __________________________, declare as follows:
1.
I have read the Protective Order in the above captioned case.
2.
I promise that I will only use the documents and things designated as
“CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” or
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” that are
given to me for purposes of this lawsuit.
3.
I promise that I will not disclose or discuss information that I learn from
documents and things designated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO
PROTECTIVE
ORDER”
or
“HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL
–
ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” with anyone other than the persons
described in the Protective Order.
1
Case 3:21-cv-11844-RHC-CI ECF No. 30, PageID.291 Filed 01/17/23 Page 10 of 10
4.
I acknowledge that, by signing this agreement, I am subjecting myself to
the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Eastern District
of Michigan with respect to enforcement of this Protective Order.
5.
I understand that any disclosure or use of documents or things designated
as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” or
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY,” or
information learned from the documents or things, in any manner contrary
to the provisions of the Protective Order may subject me to sanctions for
contempt of court.
Date: ___________
____________________________________
[Signature]
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?