Dyer v. Hardwick et al
Filing
89
ORDER Accepting and Adopting the Magistrate Judge's 77 Report and Recommendation, Overruling Plaintiff's 81 Objections and Denying Plaintiff's 71 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
FELICIA MARIE DYER,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No.
10-CV-10130
vs.
HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH
SHADEHAEDA HARDWICK, et al.,
Defendants,
_______________________________/
ORDER (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION, (2) OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS, and (3)
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
This matter is presently before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of
Magistrate Judge Laurie J. Michelson, issued May 7, 2012. The Magistrate Judge recommends
that Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction be denied. Plaintiff has filed objections to the
R&R. The Court reviews de novo those portions of the R&R to which a specific objection has
been made. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Having done so, the Court concludes that Magistrate Judge
Michelson correctly analyzed the issues presented and reached the proper result for the proper
reasons. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge’s R&R is accepted and adopted as the findings and
conclusions of the Court, Plaintiff’s objections are overruled, and Plaintiff’s motion for
preliminary injunction (Dkt. 71) is denied.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 12, 2012
Flint, Michigan
s/Mark A. Goldsmith
MARK A. GOLDSMITH
United States District Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record
and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class
U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on June 12, 2012.
s/Deborah J. Goltz
DEBORAH J. GOLTZ
Case Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?