Dyer v. Hardwick et al

Filing 89

ORDER Accepting and Adopting the Magistrate Judge's 77 Report and Recommendation, Overruling Plaintiff's 81 Objections and Denying Plaintiff's 71 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION FELICIA MARIE DYER, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 10-CV-10130 vs. HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH SHADEHAEDA HARDWICK, et al., Defendants, _______________________________/ ORDER (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, (2) OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS, and (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION This matter is presently before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge Laurie J. Michelson, issued May 7, 2012. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction be denied. Plaintiff has filed objections to the R&R. The Court reviews de novo those portions of the R&R to which a specific objection has been made. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Having done so, the Court concludes that Magistrate Judge Michelson correctly analyzed the issues presented and reached the proper result for the proper reasons. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge’s R&R is accepted and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court, Plaintiff’s objections are overruled, and Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. 71) is denied. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 12, 2012 Flint, Michigan s/Mark A. Goldsmith MARK A. GOLDSMITH United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on June 12, 2012. s/Deborah J. Goltz DEBORAH J. GOLTZ Case Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?