Pilarowski etal., v Wise etal.,
Filing
37
ORDER GRANTING Second Extension of Time for Plaintiffs to File a Response to Defendant Tanya Schnabel's Motion to Dismiss, (Responses due by 1/3/2011) - Signed by District Judge Mark A Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION GERALD D. PILAROWSKI, LISA PILAROWSKI, as the Next Friend of his Minor Children, Z. PILAROWSKI, R. PILAROWSKI, and H. PILAROWSKI, Plaintiffs, v. SUSAN WISE, DANIEL WISE, JAMES WISE, JOANNE WISE, TANYA SCHNABEL, SHELLY, NAPLES, JUDY VALIN, AND KARA MARTZ, Defendants. / ORDER GRANTING SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT TANYA SCHNABEL'S MOTION TO DISMISS On October 14, 2010, the Court entered an Order [DE #35] extending the time for Plaintiffs to file a response (to November 29, 2010) to a motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Tanya Schnabel. On November 22, 2010, Plaintiff Lisa Pilarowski notified the court that she is still searching for new counsel and another extension of time is needed to respond to Defendant Schnabel's motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the Court finds that an extension is warranted, and will grant a second extension of time for Plaintiffs to file a response to the motion to dismiss. Case Number 10-11170 Honorable Mark A. Goldsmith
1
IT IS ORDERED, that Plaintiffs shall file a response to Defendant Tanya Schnabel's Motion to Dismiss by January 3, 2011.
Dated: November 29, 2010
s/Mark A. Goldsmith HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on November 29, 2010. s/Deborah J. Goltz DEBORAH J. GOLTZ Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?