Rios v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 20

ORDER Accepting and Adopting the Magistrate Judge's 19 Report and Recommendation Denying Plaintiff's 16 Motion for Attorney Fees filed by Lori Ann Rios. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION LORI ANN RIOS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 10-CV-14443 vs. HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. _____________________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORENY FEES This matter is presently before the Court on Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) dated October 5, 2011, in which he recommends that Plaintiff’s motion for attorney fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act be denied without prejudice as premature. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has expired. Thus, Plaintiff has waived any further right to appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). In any event, the Court has reviewed the record and agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Plaintiff’s motion is premature. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the R&R and denies Plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. 16) without prejudice to Plaintiff’s ability to re-file the motion at an appropriate time. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 28, 2011 Flint, Michigan s/Mark A. Goldsmith MARK A. GOLDSMITH United States District Judge 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on October 28, 2011. s/Deborah J. Goltz DEBORAH J. GOLTZ Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?