Mullen v. Bank of America et al

Filing 19

ORDER Adopting 14 Report and Recommendation, Overruling Plaintiff's Objectons and Granting Defendants' 4 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

SANDRA MULLEN,
Plaintiff,

Civil Action No.
11-CV-10062

vs.
HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH
BANK OF AMERICA, et al.,
Defendants.
___________________________/
ORDER (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, (2) OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S
OBJECTIONS, and (3) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
This matter is presently before the Court on the Report and Recommendation
(“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon, issued on November 7, 2011.

The

Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted and that all
claims against all defendants be dismissed. Plaintiff has filed objections to the R&R, and
Defendants have filed a response thereto.
The Court reviews de novo those portions of the R&R to which a specific objection
has been made. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Having done so, the Court concludes, over Plaintiff’s
objections, that Magistrate Judge Randon correctly analyzed the issues presented and reached
the proper result for the proper reasons.1 Accordingly, Defendants’ motion to dismiss is
granted for the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge. This case is dismissed.
SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 6, 2012
Flint, Michigan

1

s/Mark A. Goldsmith
MARK A. GOLDSMITH
United States District Judge

Plaintiff’s objections merely rehash arguments presented to – and rejected by – the
Magistrate Judge.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of
record and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or
First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on January 6,
2012.
s/Deborah J. Goltz
DEBORAH J. GOLTZ
Case Manager

2