Wilson v. Rouleau et al
Filing
25
ORDER Adopting 24 Report and Recommendation granting 14 Motion to Dismiss filed by Michigan Department of Corrections Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (CMul)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
RYAN A. WILSON,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No.
11-CV-12261
vs.
HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________/
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED JANUARY 31, 2012, AND GRANTING
THE MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANT THE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT
OF CORRECTIONS
This matter is presently before the Court on Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen’s
Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), issued on January 31, 2012.
In the R&R, the
Magistrate Judge recommends that the motion to dismiss of Defendant the Michigan
Department of Corrections (MDOC) be granted. Plaintiff has not filed objections to R&R,
and the time to do so has expired. Thus, Plaintiff has waived any further right to appeal.
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). In any event, the Court has reviewed the R&R
and finds that the Magistrate Judge has reached the correct result for the proper reasons.1
MDOC’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 14) is granted.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 17, 2012
Flint, Michigan
1
s/Mark A. Goldsmith___
MARK A. GOLDSMITH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
In addition, the Court notes that Plaintiff did not file a response brief opposing MDOC’s
motion to dismiss, despite the fact that the Magistrate Judge issued an order directing
Plaintiff to do so. Plaintiff’s objections are overruled for this reason, as well.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?