Schleiger v. Gratiot County Prosecutors Office
ORDER Adopting 8 Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Plaintiff's 1 Complaint. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
TODD M. SCHLEIGER,
Civil Action No.
HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH
GRATIOT COUNTY PROSECUTOR’S
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and DISMISSING
This matter is presently before the Court on the Report and Recommendation
(“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge Laurie J. Michelson, entered on November 30, 2011 (Dkt. 8).
The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court summarily dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint.
Plaintiff has not filed objections to the R&R and the time to do so has expired. Thus,
Plaintiff has waived any further right to appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985).
As the Magistrate Judge noted in the R&R, Defendant is not an entity subject to suit under 28
U.S.C. § 1983. The Court has reviewed the R&R and finds that the Magistrate Judge has
reached the correct result for the correct reasons.
Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Dkt. 8) is accepted and adopted as the
findings and conclusions of the Court, and Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed.
Dated: January 12, 2012
s/Mark A. Goldsmith
MARK A. GOLDSMITH
United States District Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of
record and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or
First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on January 12,
s/Deborah J. Goltz
DEBORAH J. GOLTZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?