Kaufman v. Corizon Health, Incorporated et al

Filing 71

ORDER Accepting and Adopting the Magistrate Judge's 64 Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Defendant Steven Dolinski Without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION LEONARD KAUFMAN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 12-CV-10162 vs. HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH CORIZON HEALTH, INC., et al., Defendants. ________________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and DISMISSING DEFENDANT STEVEN DOLINSKI WITHOUT PREJUDICE This matter is presently before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder, issued on October 31, 2012. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant Steven Dolinski be dismissed from the case without prejudice. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the R&R and the time to do so has expired. Therefore, Plaintiff has waived any further right to contest the Magistrate Judge’s ruling. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). In any event, the Court has reviewed the R&R and finds that the Magistrate Judge has reached the correct result for the correct reason. Accordingly, the R&R is accepted and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court and Steven Dolinski is dismissed from the case without prejudice. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 16, 2012 Flint, Michigan s/Mark A. Goldsmith MARK A. GOLDSMITH United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on November 16, 2012. s/Deborah J. Goltz DEBORAH J. GOLTZ Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?