Maclin v. Holden et al

Filing 48

ORDER Accepting and Adopting 42 Report and Recommendation and Striking 40 Plaintiff's Request for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by District Judge Gershwin A. Drain. (DWor)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ROSS MACLIN, Plaintiff, Case No. 12-12480 HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN vs. KELLY HOLDEN, et al., Defendants. _______________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [#42] AND STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [#40] On June 7, 2012, Plaintiff brought the instant prisoner civil rights action alleging Defendants have violated his First Amendment rights. This matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon, who granted Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel on September 26, 2013. On that same date, counsel filed a Notice of Appearance and Plaintiff filed a Request for Preliminary Injunction. On September 30, 2013, Magistrate Judge Randon issued a Report and Recommendation recommending the Court strike Plaintiff’s Request for Preliminary Injunction because Plaintiff is currently represented by counsel. See 28 U.S.C. § 1654. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Upon review of the Report and Recommendation, the Court concludes that Magistrate Judge Randon reached the correct conclusion. -1- Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon’s September 30, 2013 Report and Recommendation [#42] is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s Request for Preliminary Injunction [#40] is HEREBY STRICKEN. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 14, 2014 /s/Gershwin A Drain GERSHWIN A. DRAIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on January 14, 2014, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. /s/ Tanya Bankston Deputy Clerk -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?