Nestel et al v. Menake et al
ORDER Denying Without Prejudice Plaintiff's 43 Motion for TRO. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
JOHN NESTEL, JR.,
Civil Action No.
HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH
DANIEL MENAKE, et al.,
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
The one-sentence “petition for restraint against transfer of property, money, and assets”
(Dkt. 43), filed yesterday, is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with the following
E.D. Mich. LR 5.1(a)(2) (requiring pagination);
E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(d)(1) (requiring motions to be accompanied by a brief);
E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(d)(2) (requiring concise statement of issues presented and controlling
or most appropriate authority for the relief sought);
Rivet v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 316 F. App’x 440, 449 (6th Cir. 2009) (requiring
that arguments be supported and developed);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b)(1) (requiring that motions state “with particularity the grounds for
seeking the order”).
Counsel is directed to familiarize himself with the rules governing motion practice and, in
particular, the rules governing the issuance of temporary restraining orders, before filing any
additional papers with this Court.
Dated: March 29, 2013
s/Mark A. Goldsmith
MARK A. GOLDSMITH
United States District Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record
and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class
U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on March 29, 2013.
s/Deborah J. Goltz
DEBORAH J. GOLTZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?