Nestel et al v. Menake et al

Filing 44

ORDER Denying Without Prejudice Plaintiff's 43 Motion for TRO. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHN NESTEL, JR., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 12-CV-12511 vs. HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH DANIEL MENAKE, et al., Defendants. ________________________/ ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER The one-sentence “petition for restraint against transfer of property, money, and assets” (Dkt. 43), filed yesterday, is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with the following authority:  E.D. Mich. LR 5.1(a)(2) (requiring pagination);  E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(d)(1) (requiring motions to be accompanied by a brief);  E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(d)(2) (requiring concise statement of issues presented and controlling or most appropriate authority for the relief sought);  Rivet v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 316 F. App’x 440, 449 (6th Cir. 2009) (requiring that arguments be supported and developed);  Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b)(1) (requiring that motions state “with particularity the grounds for seeking the order”). Counsel is directed to familiarize himself with the rules governing motion practice and, in particular, the rules governing the issuance of temporary restraining orders, before filing any additional papers with this Court. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 29, 2013 Flint, Michigan s/Mark A. Goldsmith MARK A. GOLDSMITH United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on March 29, 2013. s/Deborah J. Goltz DEBORAH J. GOLTZ Case Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?