Innovation Ventures, LLC v. Custom Nutrition Laboratories, LLC et al

Filing 129

ORDER GRANTING IN PART 127 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order and to Compel Discovery. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (Chubb, A)

Download PDF
UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN INNOVATION VENTURES, LLC f/d/b/a LIVING ESSENTIALS, a Michigan limited liability company, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. Case No. 12-13850 Hon. Terrence G. Berg CUSTOM NUTRITION LABORATORIES, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, and Defendant, NUTRITION SCIENCE LABORATORIES, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, and ALAN JONES, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. / ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND TO COMPEL DISCOVERY (DKT. 127) On September 11, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Protective Order and to Compel Discovery (Dkt. 127). Plaintiff seeks a protective order to excuse its President, Scott Henderson, from attendance at a deposition currently noticed for 10:00AM tomorrow, September 13, 2013. Plaintiff is also seeking an order compelling responses to certain discovery. The Court has thoroughly reviewed the motion and its attached exhibits. The pertinent facts are as follows: On August 6, 2013, Plaintiff provided Mr. Henderson’s name in answer to an interrogatory seeking the identities of possible trial witnesses (Dkt 127, Pl. Mot. at 5). 1 On August 22, 2013, Defendant first expressed its intension to depose Mr. Henderson (Dkt. 127, Ex. 7). On September 4, 2013, Defendant served Plaintiff with notice of Mr. Henderson’s deposition, setting the deposition for September 13, 2013, the last date for discovery related to the bifurcated issue of whether any of NSL’s Energy Liquid products contain an allegedly prohibited ingredient from the Choline Family (Dkt 127, Ex. 8). On September 6, 2013, counsel for Plaintiff promptly informed Defendant that Mr. Henderson was unavailable for deposition until after October 4, 2013, the date stipulated by the parties as the cut-off for dispositive motions related to the bifurcated issue (Dkt. 127, Ex. 1). The parties were thereafter unable to reach a compromise regarding the timing of Mr. Henderson’s deposition, so on September 9, 2013, counsel for Plaintiff contacted the Court to request a status conference for the purpose of resolving the parties’ dispute. Such a conference is currently scheduled for September 13, 2013, at 2:30PM. Nevertheless, counsel for Plaintiff expressed an intention to proceed with the deposition as scheduled (Dkt. 127, Ex. 1). In response, Plaintiff filed the instant motion. As the Supreme Court stated in Herbert v. Lando, 441 U.S. 153, 177 (1979), “judges should not hesitate to exercise appropriate control over the discovery process.” Thus, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(b)(2)(C) & 26(c)(1), Plaintiff’s Motion for a Protective Order is GRANTED. Accordingly, the deposition of Scott Henderson, presently noticed for September 13, 2013, at 10:00AM, is adjourned. 2 Further, in light of the upcoming status conference, Plaintiff’s Motion for an Order Compelling Discovery is HELD IN ABEYANCE. The Court will endeavor to resolve any and all remaining discovery disputes during the September 13, 2013 conference. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 12, 2013 s/Terrence G. Berg TERRENCE G. BERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Certificate of Service I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on September 12, 2013, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to all parties. s/A. Chubb Case Manager 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?