Keary et al v. U.S. Bank National Association ND et al
Filing
14
ORDER Denying Plaintiffs' 11 Motion for Recusal. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JAMES ROBERT KEARY, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Civil Case Nos.
11-15133 and 12-15359
vs.
HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH
U.S. BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION ND, et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________/
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECUSAL
This matter is presently before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion asking this Court to disqualify
itself from this matter (Dkt. 11).
As noted by the Sixth Circuit, “a judge is presumed to be impartial, and the party seeking
disqualification ‘bears the substantial burden of proving otherwise.’” Scott v. Metro. Health Corp.,
234 F. App’x 341, 352 (6th Cir. 2007) (quoting United States v. Denton, 434 F.3d 1104, 1111 (8th
Cir. 2006)). Plaintiffs’ motion here is incomprehensible and the grounds underlying it cannot be
discerned. Under such circumstances, Plaintiffs have not met their burden and the motion must be
denied.
Although the motion is incomprehensible, the Court believes that Plaintiffs are suggesting
that this Court cannot, for some unstated reason, act as a neutral judicial officer in this matter. To the
extent that the motion is brought under 28 U.S.C. § 144, the Court denies the motion because
Plaintiffs have not filed the required affidavit “stat[ing] the facts and the reasons for the belief that
bias or prejudice exists.” 28 U.S.C. § 144; see also Scott, 234 F. App’x at 352. To the extent that the
motion is brought under 28 U.S.C. § 455, the Court concludes that there is no basis for recusal under
that statute. The motion is denied.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 22, 2013
Flint, Michigan
s/Mark A. Goldsmith
MARK A. GOLDSMITH
United States District Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and
any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class U.S.
mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on January 22, 2013.
s/Deborah J. Goltz
DEBORAH J. GOLTZ
Case Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?