Dunham v. Malik et al

Filing 128

ORDER ADOPTING 114 Report and Recommendation for 99 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (Chubb, A)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION RUSSELL PERCY DUNHAM, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 13-10001 PARVEEN A. MALIK, et al., HON. TERRENCE G. BERG HON. PAUL J. KOMIVES Defendants. / ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives’s Report and Recommendation of July 18, 2014, (Dkt. 114) recommending that the Court grant Defendants’ motion to dismiss portions of the second amended complaint (Dkt. 99). The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections “[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy” of the report and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a “de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made.” Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to independently review the record. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–52 (1985). The Court has reviewed and will accept the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation of July 18, 2014, (Dkt. 114) as the findings and conclusions of this court. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Komives’s Report and Recommendation of July 18, 2014, (Dkt. 114) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss portions of the second amended complaint (Dkt. 99) is GRANTED and that any of Plaintiff’s claims that accrued before August 4, 2009, are hereby DISMISSED. s/Terrence G. Berg TERRENCE G. BERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: September 8, 2014 Certificate of Service I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on September 8, 2014, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to each party. By: s/A. Chubb Case Manager 2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?