Davis v. Social Security, Commissioner of
ORDER Adopting 14 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (Chubb, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case No. 13-10828
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
HON. TERRENCE G. BERG
HON. DAVID R. GRAND
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. 14)
This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge David R. Grand’s
December 9, 2013 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 14), recommending that
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be DENIED, that Defendant’s motion for
summary judgment be GRANTED, and that the findings and conclusions of the
Commissioner be AFFIRMED.
The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.
The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections “[w]ithin
fourteen days after being served with a copy” of the report and recommendations.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a “de novo determination of those
portions of the report . . . to which objection is made.” Id. Where, as here, neither
party objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to independently
review the record. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). The Court will,
therefore, accept the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation of December 9,
2013, as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Grand’s Report
and Recommendation of December 9, 2013, (Dkt. 14) is ACCEPTED and
ADOPTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for summary
judgment (Dkt. 9) is DENIED, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 13)
is DENIED, and the findings and conclusions of the Commissioner are
Dated: January 24, 2014
s/Terrence G. Berg
TERRENCE G. BERG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on January 24,
2014, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to all parties.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?