Larner v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 17

ORDER Adopting 16 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (Chubb, A)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHELLE LARNER, Plaintiff, Case No. 13-11464 HON. TERRENCE G. BERG HON. R. STEVEN WHALEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. / ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen’s April 11, 2014 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 16), recommending that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 15) be GRANTED, that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 8) be DENIED, and that the findings of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED. The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections “[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy” of the report and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a “de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made.” Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to independently review the record. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). Nevertheless, the Court has carefully reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation of April 11, 2014 (Dkt. 16), and does hereby ACCEPT and ADOPT it as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 15) is GRANTED, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 8) is DENIED, and the decision of the Commissioner, as authored by Administrative Law Judge Kathleen Eiler, is AFFIRMED. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 30, 2014 s/Terrence G. Berg TERRENCE G. BERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Certificate of Service I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on April 30, 2014, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to the parties. s/A. Chubb Case Manager 2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?