Etts et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
Filing
13
ORDER DENYING as Moot 5 Motion to Dismiss and 7 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
TROY ETTS, et al.,
Civil Case No. 13-CV-11588
Plaintiffs,
vs.
HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST
COMPANY, as Trustee for Securitized Asset
Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2004-NCI,
Pooling and Servicing Agreement Dated as of
Aprill, 2004, et al.,
Defendants.
__________________________/
ORDER DENYING THE MOTIONS TO DISMISS AS MOOT (DKT. 5 and 7)
On May 28, 2013, the Court entered an Order (Dkt. 6) stating that it had reviewed
Defendant Deutsche Bank National Trust Company’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 5). The Court did
not express any view regarding the merits of the motion to dismiss, but afforded Plaintiffs an
opportunity to cure any purported pleading defects by granting Plaintiffs leave to file an
amended complaint by June 11, 2013. The Court stated that if Plaintiffs filed an amended
complaint, the Court would deny without prejudice the motion to dismiss as moot. After the
Court entered its Order, Defendant Randall S. Miller & Associates P.C. filed, on the same day, a
motion to dismiss the original complaint (Dkt. 7). On June 11, 2013, Plaintiffs filed an amended
complaint (Dkt. 11).
Accordingly, because Plaintiffs have filed an amended complaint, the currently pending
motions to dismiss (Dkts. 5 and 7) are denied as moot.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 12, 2013
Flint, Michigan
s/Mark A. Goldsmith
MARK A. GOLDSMITH
United States District Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record
and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class
U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on June 12, 2013.
s/Deborah J. Goltz
DEBORAH J. GOLTZ
Case Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?