Henderson v. Social Security, Commissioner of

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING 15 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (Chubb, A)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TAMMIE HENDERSON, Plaintiff, Case No. 13-13225 HON. TERRENCE G. BERG HON. DAVID R. GRAND v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. / ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Dkt. 15) This matter is before the court on Magistrate Judge David R. Grand’s June 19, 2014 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 15), recommending that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 13) be GRANTED, that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 10) be DENIED, and that the findings of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED. The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections “[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy” of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a “de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made.” Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to independently review the record. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). Nevertheless, the Court has carefully reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation of June 19, 2014 (Dkt. 15), and does hereby ACCEPT and ADOPT it as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 13) is GRANTED, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 10) is DENIED, and the decision of the Commissioner, as authored by Administrative Law Judge Regina Sobrino, is AFFIRMED. SO ORDERED. Dated: July 16, 2014 s/Terrence G. Berg TERRENCE G. BERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Certificate of Service I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on July 16, 2014, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to all parties. s/A. Chubb Case Manager 2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?