Arnold et al v. Heyns et al
Filing
61
OPINION and ORDER (1) Adopting Magistrate Judge's 60 Report and Recommendation; (2) Denying Plaintiff's 53 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction; and (3) Denying Defendants' 58 Motion to Dismiss or Sanction Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MICHAEL ARNOLD,
Plaintiff,
Civil Case No. 13-14137
Honorable Linda V. Parker
v.
DANIEL H. HEYNS, MICHAEL
MARTIN, and BRAD PURVIS,
Defendants.
________________________________/
OPINION AND ORDER (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
JUNE 12, 2015 REPORT & RECOMMENDATION [ECF NO. 60]; (2)
DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [ECF NO. 53]; AND (3)
DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS OR SANCTION
PLAINTIFF [ECF NO. 58]
On September 27, 2013, Plaintiff commenced this action against Defendants
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 In the Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants are
violating his rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments and the Religious
Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”) by implementing a Michigan
Department of Corrections (“MDOC”) policy directive that replaces all previously
Two other individuals initially were named as Plaintiffs; however, they
withdrew from this action on March 11, 2015. (ECF No. 52.)
1
offered religious menus with a vegan diet.2 Plaintiff is an Orthodox Jew incarcerated
in an MDOC prison facility. The matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Mona
K. Majzoub for all pretrial matters. (ECF No. 11.)
On April 9, 2015, Plaintiff filed a second motion for temporary restraining
order and/or a preliminary injunction. (ECF No. 53.) On June 2, 2015, Defendants
filed a motion to dismiss or sanction Plaintiff due to Plaintiff’s failure to participate in
discovery. (ECF No. 58.) On June 12, 2015, Magistrate Judge Majzoub issued an
R&R in which she recommends that the Court deny both motions. (ECF No. 60.)
With respect to Plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief, Magistrate Judge Majzoub
finds that facts still remain to be developed in order to evaluate Plaintiff’s likelihood
of success and therefore his right to obtain injunctive relief at this time. (Id. at Pg ID
964.) Under the circumstances presented, Magistrate Judge Majzoub finds monetary
sanctions, much less dismissal as a sanction, inappropriate and inherently unjust in
response to Plaintiff’s failure to appear at his scheduled deposition. (Id. at Pg ID 96566.) Magistrate Judge Majzoub does recommend that the Court warn Plaintiff that
any further failure to participate in discovery or comply with the Court’s orders may
result in sanctions, including dismissal of this matter. (Id. at 966.)
In an Opinion and Order issued June 24, 2014, this Court adopted
Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub’s recommendation to sua sponte dismiss
Plaintiffs’ Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection claim. (ECF No. 28.)
2
2
At the conclusion of her R&R, Magistrate Judge Majzoub informs the parties
that they must file any objections to the R&R within fourteen days of service. (Id.)
Neither party has filed objections to the R&R.
The Court has carefully reviewed the R&R and concurs with the conclusions
reached by Magistrate Judge Majzoub. The Court therefore adopts Magistrate Judge
Majzoub’s June 12, 2015 Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED, that Plaintiff’s Second Emergency Motion for Temporary
Restraining Order and for Preliminary Injunction [ECF No. 53] is DENIED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Defendants’ Motion to Involuntarily
Dismiss this Matter or Sanction Plaintiff for Failing to Participate in Discovery [ECF
No. 58] is DENIED, although Plaintiff is warned that any further failure to participate
in discovery or comply with the Court’s orders may result in sanctions, including
dismissal of this matter.
s/ Linda V. Parker
LINDA V. PARKER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: July 13, 2015
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of
record and/or pro se parties on this date, July 13, 2015, by electronic and/or U.S. First
Class mail.
s/ Richard Loury
Case Manager
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?