Wright v. Cam Hiltz Trucking et al
Filing
20
ORDER Striking 19 MOTION to Compel Defendants' Signed Answers to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents as Well as More Definite and Sufficient Answers filed by Carolyn Wright. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Goltz, D)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
CAROLYN WRIGHT,
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. 13-CV-14690
vs.
HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH
CAM HILTZ TRUCKING, et al.,
Defendants.
_______________________________/
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL (Dkt. 19)
On July 23, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel (Dkt. 19). The Case Management and
Scheduling Order requires that counsel seek concurrence from opposing counsel prior to filing any
motion.
Specifically, section II.B.1 of the Order provides that, “The Court requires strict
compliance with E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(a), which obligates moving parties to seek concurrence before
filing any motion. A moving party must certify compliance with this obligation by setting forth in
the first paragraph of every motion” one of four statements, or a substantially similar one, as
outlined in the Order. See 1/17/14 Order (Dkt. 8). The Order further requires certification of
compliance with the obligation to seek concurrence, and it warns that failure to satisfy these
requirements “will result in the motion being struck.” Id. (emphasis deleted). Plaintiff’s motion
does not satisfy these requirements or provide good cause for excusing them.
Accordingly, the Court strikes the motion to compel (Dkt. 19).
1
SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 24, 2014
Flint, Michigan
s/Mark A. Goldsmith
MARK A. GOLDSMITH
United States District Judge
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record
and any unrepresented parties via the Court's ECF System to their respective email or First Class
U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on July 24, 2014.
s/Deborah J. Goltz
DEBORAH J. GOLTZ
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?