Townsend v. Rhodes et al

Filing 49

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 42 Motion to Correct Mistake--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION RICHARD TOWNSEND, Plaintiff, Case No. 4:14-CV-10411 Judge Terrence G. Berg Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti v. KAREN RHODES, VICKI CARLSON, LINDA HAASE, MARCIA O’CONNELL and JOHN DOES 1-4, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CORRECT MISTAKE [DE 42] Plaintiff having filed a motion to correct a mistake in paragraph 2 of his complaint, to reflect the fact that he is a type I insulin-dependent diabetic, rather than a type II insulin-dependent diabetic; no opposition having been received from any of the defendants; the Court having reviewed the motion and being satisfied that it is appropriate to make this minor correction in the pleadings to conform to the evidence; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Plaintiff’s motion to correct mistake is GRANTED; 2. The record will reflect Plaintiff’s allegation that he is a type I insulindependent diabetic, rather than a type II insulin-dependent diabetic, who requires insulin three (3) times daily, as though so stated in paragraph 2 of his complaint; and 3. In the unlikely event that this corrected allegation requires further pleading by any of the defendants, they are each granted leave to file amended answers on or before June 4, 2015, with respect to paragraph 2 of the complaint only. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: May 21, 2015 s/Anthony P. Patti ANTHONY P. PATTI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE I hereby certify that a copy of the following order has been sent to parities of record on May 21, 2015 to parties of record electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. s/Michael Williams Case Manager for the Honorable Anthony P. Patti 

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?