Dabish v. Dabish et al

Filing 25

ORDER Adopting 24 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (Chubb, A)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MARVIN DABISH, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 14-13878 FATINA DABISH, et al., Defendants. HON. TERRENCE G. BERG HON. ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD / ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. 24) This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford’s March 31, 2015 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 24), which recommends that: Plaintiff’s motion to remand (Dkt. 5) be DENIED; Defendants Fatina and Nasseer Dabish be dismissed under Fed. R. Civ. P 21; Plaintiff’s motions for default judgment (Dkts. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15) be DENIED; Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 3) be GRANTED; and Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 20) be DENIED. The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and finds that it is well-reasoned and reaches the correct result. The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections “[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy” of the report and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a “de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made.” Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to independently review the record. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). The Court will, therefore, accept Magistrate Judge Stafford’s Report and Recommendation of March 31, 2015, as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Stafford’s Report and Recommendation of March 31, 2015 (Dkt. 24) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to remand (Dkt. 5) is DENIED; Defendants Fatina and Nasseer Dabish are dismissed under Fed. R. Civ. P 21; Plaintiff’s motions for default judgment (Dkts. 11, 12, 13, 14, 15) are DENIED; Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 3) is GRANTED; and Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 20) is DENIED. Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendants, and against Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 21, 2015 s/Terrence G. Berg TERRENCE G. BERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Certificate of Service I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on April 21, 2015, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to all parties, and was served upon unrepresented parties via ordinary mail. s/A. Chubb Case Manager 2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?