Eggleston v. Daniels et al

Filing 99

ORDER Striking 94 , 95 , 96 , and 97 Plaintiff's Various Motions and Affadavit as Frivolous, and Directing Plaintiff to the Court's Previous Order. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION   SOPHIA EGGLESTON, Plaintiff, Case No. 15-11893 Hon. Terrence G. Berg v. LEE DANIELS, et al., Defendant. ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S VARIOUS MOTIONS AND AFFIDAVIT AS FRIVOLOUS (Dkts. 94, 95, 96, 97) AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO THE COURT’S PREVIOUS ORDER Plaintiff Sophia Eggleston voluntarily dismissed this case in March, 2017. Dkt. 79. Plaintiff subsequently filed a “Motion to Reopen” her case in May, 2017 (Dkt. 81), which the court denied along with several other accompanying, miscellaneous motions. Dkt. 93. In that order, the court advised Plaintiff that because she had stipulated to dismissal of her case without prejudice she could file a new Complaint (i.e. an entirely new case) if she chose. Instructions on how to do so can be found here: https://www.mied.uscourts.gov/PDFFIles/HowToFileYourLawsuitHandbook.pdf. The court will therefore strike Plaintiff’s remaining filings (Dkts. 94, 95, 96, 97) and any further filings as frivolous. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 10, 2018 s/Terrence G. Berg TERRENCE G. BERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Certificate of Service I hereby certify that this Order was electronically filed, and the parties and/or counsel of record were served on August 21, 2018. s/A. Chubb Case Manager 2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?