Eggleston v. Daniels et al
Filing
99
ORDER Striking 94 , 95 , 96 , and 97 Plaintiff's Various Motions and Affadavit as Frivolous, and Directing Plaintiff to the Court's Previous Order. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
SOPHIA EGGLESTON,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 15-11893
Hon. Terrence G. Berg
v.
LEE DANIELS, et al.,
Defendant.
ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S VARIOUS MOTIONS
AND AFFIDAVIT AS FRIVOLOUS (Dkts. 94, 95, 96, 97) AND
DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO THE COURT’S
PREVIOUS ORDER
Plaintiff Sophia Eggleston voluntarily dismissed this case in
March, 2017. Dkt. 79. Plaintiff subsequently filed a “Motion to Reopen” her case in May, 2017 (Dkt. 81), which the court denied
along with several other accompanying, miscellaneous motions.
Dkt. 93. In that order, the court advised Plaintiff that because she
had stipulated to dismissal of her case without prejudice she could
file a new Complaint (i.e. an entirely new case) if she chose. Instructions on how to do so can be found here:
https://www.mied.uscourts.gov/PDFFIles/HowToFileYourLawsuitHandbook.pdf.
The court will therefore strike Plaintiff’s remaining filings
(Dkts. 94, 95, 96, 97) and any further filings as frivolous.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 10, 2018
s/Terrence G. Berg
TERRENCE G. BERG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that this Order was electronically filed, and the
parties and/or counsel of record were served on August 21, 2018.
s/A. Chubb
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?