Hall v. Chapman et al

Filing 52

ORDER Adopting 51 Report and Recommendation re 45 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION   WALTER LEE HALL, Plaintiff, Case No. 15-13771 Hon. Terrence G. Berg v. KEVIN M. CHAPMAN, Defendant. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. 51) This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti’s December 20, 2017 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 51), recommending that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 45) be GRANTED. The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections “[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy” of a report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a “de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made.” Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the 1   district court is not obligated to independently review the record. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). The Court will therefore accept the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation of December 20, 2017 as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Patti’s Report and Recommendation of December 20, 2017 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and that Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 26, 2018 s/Terrence G. Berg TERRENCE G. BERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Certificate of Service I hereby certify that this Order was electronically filed, and the parties and/or counsel of record were served on January 26, 2018. s/A. Chubb Case Manager 2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?