Guldenstein et al v. Merit Energy Company LLC

Filing 61

ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 39 Motion Reimburstment of Cost--Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ROBERT GULDENSTEIN and KAREN GULDENSTEIN, Plaintiffs, Case No. 4:15-cv-14181 District Judge Linda V. Parker Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti v. MERIT ENERGY COMPANY, L.L.C., Defendant. ___________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS OF CANCELLED DEPSOSITION OF DR. ERNEST CHIODO (DE 39) Defendant filed the above-described motion on February 27, 2017. (DE 39). A response and reply have been filed. (DEs 46, 50.) A statement of resolved and unresolved issues was filed on April 13, 2017. (DE 60.) Judge Parker referred this motion to me for hearing and determination, and a hearing was noticed for April 17, 2017. (DEs 44, 47, 48.) On the date set for hearing, attorneys Gerald V. Padilla, William L. Kiriazis, and Timothy J. Jordan appeared. For the reasons stated on the record, Defendant’s motion for reimbursement of costs of cancelled deposition of Dr. Ernest Chiodo is GRANTED. Plaintiff SHALL reimburse defense counsel in the amount of $1,275.00 within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order. If Dr. Chiodo’s deposition has yet to occur, the parties are to find and mutually confirm in writing a date for this deposition to take place, which must occur on or before May 31, 2017. If Plaintiffs’ counsel fails to appear at the deposition after confirming his availability, as required by this order, the deposition may go forward without him. IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: April 17, 2017 s/Anthony P. Patti ANTHONY P. PATTI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was sent to parties of record on April 17, 2017, electronically and/or by U.S. Mail. s/Michael Williams Case Manager for the Honorable Anthony P. Patti 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?