Colston v. Liebeck et al

Filing 98

ORDER Adopting 97 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION   MARK COLSTON and TAMMIE JANIS Plaintiffs, Case No. 15-14314 Hon. Terrence G. Berg Hon. Mona K. Majzoub v. ROBERT LIEBECK, STEVE LIEBECK, and CHELSEA HOMETOWN SERVICES, Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. 97) This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub’s January 29, 2018 Report and Recommendation, Dkt. 97, recommending that Plaintiffs’ Motions for Default Judgment (Dkts. 90, 91, and 92) be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART through the entry of a default judgment against Defendants in the amount of $40,000. The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections “[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy” of a report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a “de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made.” Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to independently review the record. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). The Court will therefore accept the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation of January 29, 2018 as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Majzoub’s Report and Recommendation of August 29, 2017 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 22, 2018 s/Terrence G. Berg TERRENCE G. BERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Certificate of Service I hereby certify that this Order was electronically filed, and the parties and/or counsel of record were served on March 22, 2018. s/A. Chubb Case Manager 2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?