Bradford v. Albercook et al
Filing
32
ORDER Adopting 30 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DANIEL L. BRADFORD,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 16-12214
Hon. Terrence G. Berg
Hon. Mona K. Majzoub
CAREN ALBERCOOK et al.,
Defendant.
/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
(Dkt. 30)
This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Mona K.
Majzoub’s November 28, 2017 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 30),
recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. 27),
be DENIED.
The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation. The law provides that either party may serve and file
written objections “[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a
copy” of a report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The
district court will make a “de novo determination of those portions of
the report . . . to which objection is made.” Id. Where, as here, neither
party objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to
independently review the record. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 14952 (1985). The Court will therefore accept the Magistrate’s Report and
Recommendation of November 28, 2017 as this Court’s findings of fact
and conclusions of law.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge
Majzoub’s Report and Recommendation of November 28, 2017 is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.
SO ORDERED.
s/Terrence G. Berg
TERRENCE G. BERG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: January 4, 2018
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on January
4, 2018, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to each
party.
By: s/A. Chubb
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?