United States of America v. Hardin
OPINION and ORDER (1) Adopting Magistrate Judge's 23 Report and Recommendation; and (2) Denying Defendant's Request to Amend, Alter, or Quash the Writ of Garnishment. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Case No. 16-13150
Honorable Linda V. Parker
OPINION AND ORDER (1) ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S
MARCH 8, 2017 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [ECF NO. 23] AND
(2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO AMEND, ALTER, OR
QUASH THE WRIT OF GARNISHMENT [ECF NO. 13]
Presently before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”)
issued on March 8, 2017 by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford recommending
that the Court affirm the writ of garnishment against Defendant Shirley Hardin
(“Defendant”). (ECF No 23.)
On October 13, 2016, the Clerk of the Court entered a judgment by default
on Defendant in the amount of $11,952.96 plus post-judgment interest. (ECF Nos.
6, 7.) On December 16, 2016, the government requested a writ of garnishment and
Defendant requested a hearing regarding the garnishment. (ECF Nos. 9, 13.) This
case was referred to Magistrate Judge Stafford on January 4, 2017 for the hearing.
(ECF No. 14.)
The hearing was scheduled for March 6, 2017. Defendant Hardin failed to
appear for the hearing. After Defendant’s failure to appear, Magistrate Judge
Stafford issued a R&R on March 8, 2017 recommending that the Court affirm the
writ of garnishment. (ECF No. 23.) At the conclusion of the R&R, Magistrate
Judge Stafford informs the parties that they must file any objections to the R&R
within fourteen days. (Id. at Pg ID 70-1.) She further advises that the “[f]ailure to
file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of appeal.” (Id.,
citations omitted). No objections were filed.
The Court has carefully reviewed the R&R and concurs with the conclusions
reached by Magistrate Judge Stafford. The Court therefore adopts Magistrate
Judge Stafford’s March 8, 2017 Report and Recommendation.
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s request to amend, alter, or quash the
writ (ECF No. 13) is DENIED.
s/ Linda V. Parker
LINDA V. PARKER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: May 3, 2017
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of
record and/or pro se parties on this date, May 3, 2017, by electronic and/or U.S.
First Class mail.
s/ Richard Loury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?