King v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 22

ORDER Adopting 21 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DIANE R. KING, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 16-13196 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. HON. TERRENCE G. BERG HON. R. STEVEN WHALEN / ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. 21) This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen’s August 29, 2017 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 21), recommending that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 19), be DENIED, and that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 11) be GRANTED and remanding the case for further administrative proceedings. The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections “[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy” of a report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a “de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made.” Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to independently review the record. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). The Court will therefore accept the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation of August 29, 2017 as this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Whalen’s Report and Recommendation of August 29, 2017 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 27, 2017 s/Terrence G. Berg TERRENCE G. BERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Certificate of Service I hereby certify that this Order was electronically submitted on September 27, 2017, using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification to all parties. s/A. Chubb Case Manager 2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?