Richards et al v. Jackson, City of et al
Filing
66
OPINION and ORDER Granting Defendant's 64 Motion for Stay of Proceedings. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DASHUNA RICHARDS and
EDDIE HARRIS,
Plaintiffs,
Civil Case No. 16-13520
Honorable Linda V. Parker
v.
CITY OF JACKSON and
MATHEW PETERS, in his
individual and official capacities,
Defendants.
___________________________________/
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
STAY OF PROCEEDINGS (ECF NO. 64)
Defendant, Mathew Peters, filed a Notice of Appeal from this Court’s
August 27, 2018 Order granting, in part, and denying, in part, Defendants’ Motion
for Summary Judgment. (ECF Nos. 45, 59 & 62.) In due course, Defendant has
requested the Court, through the instant motion, to stay proceedings pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 62(b)(4) and Fed. R. App. P. 8(a)(1)(A). (ECF No. 64.)
A proper notice of appeal divests the district court of jurisdiction and
transfers jurisdiction to the court of appeals. Lewis v. Alexander, 987 F.2d 392,
394 (6th Cir. 1993). Therefore, as a matter of course, the Court will grant
Defendant’s motion for stay of proceedings pending the disposition of Defendant’s
appeal.
1
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s motion for stay of proceedings (ECF
No. 64) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Linda V. Parker
LINDA V. PARKER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: October 15, 2018
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of
record and/or pro se parties on this date, October 15, 2018, by electronic and/or
U.S. First Class mail.
s/ R. Loury
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?