Hall v. Chapman et al

Filing 40

ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 38 Request for an Extension of Time to Respond filed by Walter Lee Hall (Plaintiff's Response Due by 12/10/2021 ) Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (MWil)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Walter Lee Hall, Plaintiff, Case No. 4:17-cv-10895 District Judge Terrence G. Berg Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti v. Kevin M. Chapman, et al., Defendant(s) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST (ECF No. 38) FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 34) Currently pending before the Court is a motion to dismiss, filed on September 7, 2021 by four – Chapman, Jukuri, Swetz and Polkinghorn – of the five Defendants. (ECF No. 34.) Service is ongoing as to Defendant Finch. (ECF No. 39.) In accordance with the Court’s September 8, 2021 order, Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss was due on October 8, 2021. (ECF No. 35.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed a response. By a letter dated October 8, 2021, post-marked October 15, 2021, and entered into the docket on October 22, 2021, Plaintiff seeks a thirty-day extension of time within which to file a response. (ECF No. 38.) According to Plaintiff, he is “seeking assistance to help respond.” (Id.) Upon consideration, Plaintiff’s request (ECF No. 38) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have up to and including Friday, December 10, 2021 by which to file his response to the pending motion to dismiss (ECF No. 34). IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: November 8, 2021 ________________ Anthony P. Patti U.S. Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?