Doe - 1 et al v. The Coliseum, Inc., d/b/a The Coliseum et al
Filing
64
OPINION and ORDER Denying Without Prejudice Defendants' 23 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JANE DOES 1, 2 and 3, individually
and on behalf of all other similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
Civil Case No. 17-12212
Honorable Linda V. Parker
v.
THE COLISEUM BAR & GRILL, INC.,
ABCDE OPERATING, LLC d/b/a The
Penthouse Club, M & M ZIN ENTERPRISES,
INC., JOHNI SEEMA, AND ALAN
MARKOVITZ,
Defendants.
/
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 23)
This lawsuit arises from the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C.
§ 201, et seq. and the Michigan Minimum Wage Law (“MWL”), MCL 408.382 et
seq. On September 18, 2017, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss based upon an
alleged mandatory arbitration agreement. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiffs filed a response
on October 9, 2017, claiming the arbitration agreement is invalid because it
contains an invalid collective action waiver. On May 31, 2018, Defendants filed a
request for an immediate hearing on the motion to dismiss in light of the United
States Supreme Court’s decision in Epic Sys. Corp. v. Lewis, No. 16-285, 2018 WL
2292444 (U.S. May 21, 2018). (ECF No. 59.) On June 20, 2018, this Court held a
hearing on the motion to dismiss. The Court finds Defendants’ motion premature
and denies the motion for the reasons stated on the record.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 23) is
DENIED, without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/ Linda V. Parker
LINDA V. PARKER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: July 16, 2018
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of
record and/or pro se parties on this date, July 16, 2018, by electronic and/or U.S.
First Class mail.
s/ R. Loury
Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?