Doe - 1 et al v. The Coliseum, Inc., d/b/a The Coliseum et al

Filing 64

OPINION and ORDER Denying Without Prejudice Defendants' 23 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JANE DOES 1, 2 and 3, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil Case No. 17-12212 Honorable Linda V. Parker v. THE COLISEUM BAR & GRILL, INC., ABCDE OPERATING, LLC d/b/a The Penthouse Club, M & M ZIN ENTERPRISES, INC., JOHNI SEEMA, AND ALAN MARKOVITZ, Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 23) This lawsuit arises from the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. and the Michigan Minimum Wage Law (“MWL”), MCL 408.382 et seq. On September 18, 2017, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss based upon an alleged mandatory arbitration agreement. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiffs filed a response on October 9, 2017, claiming the arbitration agreement is invalid because it contains an invalid collective action waiver. On May 31, 2018, Defendants filed a request for an immediate hearing on the motion to dismiss in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Epic Sys. Corp. v. Lewis, No. 16-285, 2018 WL 2292444 (U.S. May 21, 2018). (ECF No. 59.) On June 20, 2018, this Court held a hearing on the motion to dismiss. The Court finds Defendants’ motion premature and denies the motion for the reasons stated on the record. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 23) is DENIED, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Linda V. Parker LINDA V. PARKER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: July 16, 2018 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or pro se parties on this date, July 16, 2018, by electronic and/or U.S. First Class mail. s/ R. Loury Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?