Thompson v. General Linen Supply Company

Filing 7

ORDER Denying Without Prejudice Defendant's 4 Motion to Dismiss as Moot. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION WALTER THOMPSON, Plaintiff, Case No. 17-cv-13739 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. GENERAL LINEN SUPPLY CO., Defendant. _________________________________/ ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF #4) AS MOOT On November 16, 2017, Plaintiff Walter Thompson filed this action against Defendant General Linen Supply Co. (See Compl., ECF #1.) Among other things, Thompson alleges that General Linen retaliated against him in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (See id.) On March 16, 2018, General Linen filed a motion to dismiss Thompson’s Complaint under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See ECF #4.) On March 16, 2018, the Court entered an order in which it granted Thompson leave to amend the Complaint. (See ECF #5.) In that order, the Court stated that it would deny without prejudice the motion to dismiss as moot if Thompson filed an Amended Complaint. (See id. at Pg. ID 205.) On April 7, 2018, Thompson filed an Amended Complaint. (See ECF #6.) 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that General Linen’s motion to dismiss is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as MOOT. s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: April 10, 2018 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on April 10, 2018, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/Holly A. Monda Case Manager (810) 341-9764 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?