Thompson v. General Linen Supply Company
Filing
7
ORDER Denying Without Prejudice Defendant's 4 Motion to Dismiss as Moot. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
WALTER THOMPSON,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 17-cv-13739
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
v.
GENERAL LINEN SUPPLY CO.,
Defendant.
_________________________________/
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF #4) AS MOOT
On November 16, 2017, Plaintiff Walter Thompson filed this action against
Defendant General Linen Supply Co. (See Compl., ECF #1.) Among other things,
Thompson alleges that General Linen retaliated against him in violation of Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. (See id.)
On March 16, 2018, General Linen filed a motion to dismiss Thompson’s
Complaint under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. (See ECF #4.) On March 16, 2018, the Court entered an order in which
it granted Thompson leave to amend the Complaint. (See ECF #5.) In that order, the
Court stated that it would deny without prejudice the motion to dismiss as moot if
Thompson filed an Amended Complaint. (See id. at Pg. ID 205.) On April 7, 2018,
Thompson filed an Amended Complaint. (See ECF #6.)
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that General Linen’s motion to
dismiss is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as MOOT.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: April 10, 2018
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the
parties and/or counsel of record on April 10, 2018, by electronic means and/or
ordinary mail.
s/Holly A. Monda
Case Manager
(810) 341-9764
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?