Jacobus v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
13
OPINION and ORDER Adopting Magistrate Judge's 12 Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Action. Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (RLou)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
LISAMARIE JACOBUS,
Plaintiff,
Civil Case No. 18-11874
Honorable Linda V. Parker
v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
________________________________/
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S OCTOBER
12, 2018 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 12)
AND DISMISSING ACTION
On June 11, 2018, Plaintiff LisaMarie Jacobus, proceeding pro se, filed this
action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) for a review of the final decision
of the Commissioner of Social Security to deny her applications for social security
disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits. (ECF No.
1.) On June 18, 2018, the Court entered an Order granting Plaintiff’s application
to proceed without prepaying fees or costs. (ECF No. 5.) The Court also entered
an Order the next day directing Plaintiff to complete service documents and for
service of process by the U.S. Marshal. (ECF No. 6.) Specifically, Plaintiff was
ordered to “complete and present to the Clerk’s Office for issuance, three (3)
summonses for each defendant to be served, within fourteen (14) days of the date
of this Notice.” (Id.) On July 12, 2018, after receiving improperly completed
copies of summons for each Defendant, the Clerk of the Court issued new
summons for each Defendant. (ECF No. 8.) And, on July 23, 2018, the Court
entered an amended Order granting Plaintiff’s application to proceed without
prepaying fees or costs (ECF No. 9), and an amended Order directing Plaintiff to
complete service documents for service of process by the U.S. Marshal,
specifically directing Plaintiff to complete and present to the Clerk’s Office the
following documents within fourteen days:
1. One (1) copy of the complaint for each defendant;
2. Two (2) USM 285 forms for each defendant;
3. Three (3) summonses for each defendant.
(ECF No. 10.) That Order further provided that “upon receipt of the properly
completed documents listed above,” the Clerk is “directed to process this case for
service” and “the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve” the documents upon each
defendant “without prepayment of the usual costs for such service.” (Id.)
However, when the “properly completed documents” were not presented to
the Clerk’s office and Defendant Commissioner of Social Security was not served,
the Court issued an order to show cause for failure to effect service over
Defendant. (ECF No. 11.) Specifically, the Court ordered Plaintiff “to SHOW
CAUSE IN WRITING ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 4, 2018 why the Court
2
should not dismiss the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security from this action
and why the Court should allow an extension of time to effect service.” (Id.) The
Order further stated that “[i]n the event that Plaintiff fails to provide good cause,
the Court will issue a Report and Recommendation that Plaintiff’s claims against
the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security be dismissed without prejudice.”
(Id.) To date, Plaintiff has not responded to the Show Cause Order. Subsequently,
Magistrate Judge Patti filed the instant Report and Recommendation (“R&R”)
recommending the dismissal of Plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 12.) Neither
Plaintiff nor Defendant filed objections to the R&R.
The Court has carefully reviewed the R&R and concurs with the conclusions
reached by Magistrate Judge Patti. The Court therefore adopts Magistrate Judge
Patti’s October 12, 2018 R&R.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE and this matter is CLOSED.
s/ Linda V. Parker
LINDA V. PARKER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: November 20, 2018
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of
record and/or pro se parties on this date, November 20, 2018, by electronic and/or
3
U.S. First Class mail.
s/ R. Loury
Case Manager
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?