CT RESIDUAL HOLDINGS, INC. v. APTIV CORPORATION et al
Filing
39
ORDER (1) Denying Counter-Defendants' 25 and 26 Motions to Dismiss and (2) Staying All Dates Pending Parties' Facilitation. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)
Case 4:19-cv-13451-MFL-RSW ECF No. 39 filed 09/10/20
PageID.522
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
CT RESIDUAL HOLDINGS INC.,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 19-cv-13451
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
v.
APTIV PLC, APTIV CORPORATION, and
DELPHI CORPORATION,
Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs
v.
CT RESIDUAL HOLDINGS, INC.,
DAVID P. PLOUCHA, and WILLIAM
E. LEISENRING,
Counter-Defendants.
__________________________________________________________________/
ORDER (1) DENYING COUNTER-DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO
DISMISS (ECF Nos. 25, 26) AND (2) STAYING ALL DATES PENDING
PARTIES’ FACILITATION
On March 5, 2020, Counter-Defendants David P. Ploucha and William E.
Leisenring filed motions to dismiss Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs’ Aptiv and Aptiv
PLC’s Counterclaim for declaratory judgment and breach of contract. (See Mots.,
ECF No. 25, 26.) Plaintiff CT Residual Holdings filed a notice of concurrence and
joinder in those motions. (See ECF No. 31.)
1
Case 4:19-cv-13451-MFL-RSW ECF No. 39 filed 09/10/20
PageID.523
Page 2 of 2
The Court held a hearing on the motions on September 10, 2020. For the
reasons stated on the record during the hearing, the motions are DENIED. As further
explained on the record, all dates in the Court’s case management and scheduling
order are STAYED until further order of the Court following the parties’ facilitation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: September 10, 2020
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the
parties and/or counsel of record on September 10, 2020, by electronic means
and/or ordinary mail.
s/ Holly A. Monda
Case Manager
(810) 341-9764
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?