Filing 39

ORDER (1) Denying Counter-Defendants' 25 and 26 Motions to Dismiss and (2) Staying All Dates Pending Parties' Facilitation. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HMon)

Download PDF
Case 4:19-cv-13451-MFL-RSW ECF No. 39 filed 09/10/20 PageID.522 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CT RESIDUAL HOLDINGS INC., Plaintiffs, Case No. 19-cv-13451 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. APTIV PLC, APTIV CORPORATION, and DELPHI CORPORATION, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs v. CT RESIDUAL HOLDINGS, INC., DAVID P. PLOUCHA, and WILLIAM E. LEISENRING, Counter-Defendants. __________________________________________________________________/ ORDER (1) DENYING COUNTER-DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (ECF Nos. 25, 26) AND (2) STAYING ALL DATES PENDING PARTIES’ FACILITATION On March 5, 2020, Counter-Defendants David P. Ploucha and William E. Leisenring filed motions to dismiss Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs’ Aptiv and Aptiv PLC’s Counterclaim for declaratory judgment and breach of contract. (See Mots., ECF No. 25, 26.) Plaintiff CT Residual Holdings filed a notice of concurrence and joinder in those motions. (See ECF No. 31.) 1   Case 4:19-cv-13451-MFL-RSW ECF No. 39 filed 09/10/20 PageID.523 Page 2 of 2 The Court held a hearing on the motions on September 10, 2020. For the reasons stated on the record during the hearing, the motions are DENIED. As further explained on the record, all dates in the Court’s case management and scheduling order are STAYED until further order of the Court following the parties’ facilitation. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: September 10, 2020 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on September 10, 2020, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/ Holly A. Monda Case Manager (810) 341-9764 2  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?